Thread:Sylvandyr/@comment-5089372-20130605202109/@comment-4830404-20130605211900

Hmm... When I read the original chart with the Strengths vs. Weaknesses, I read it in the following way...

Let's say Red was the listed color. If Green was listed under Strength and Yellow, Blue were listed under Weakness, to me that means that you would want to use Red against Green and you want to avoid Yellow, Blue if you are using a Red dragon.

The current way makes sense too, but maybe a rewording will do? For example:

Enemy type / Use / Avoid using

So when people read that, they would try to use the colors in the "Use" column against the enemy color, and they would try not to use the ones in the "Avoid using" column.

That said, colors aren't the only things that affect the outcome of the battle, which is imo the real problem that's causing all the confusion. In the first place, I haven't figured out when Bash or Magic is better with *the same dragon* using it. That choice alone can make a HUGE difference in the damage done... Last night I used a Virtue's Magic against an Eagle and it one shotted, but then I used Virtue against Parakeet today and Bash was more effective than Magic... =/  Since Parakeet is rarer than Virtue I expected the fight to be tougher, but I don't get why the type of attack effectiveness changed.

So the huge issue that we need to somehow clear up is that X factor. Using a type that's strong against another type does not guarantee victory. I see the disclaimers there but unfortunately not a lot of people seem to be interested in reading >_<