Thread:Sylvandyr/@comment-5089372-20130411194029/@comment-4830404-20130415184959

Thanks!

I agree, I think no Mythic + Mythic = Atlas is probably because it is much harder to get than the Peacock or Dawntree. Mythic and Atlas are both rare, the habitats as you pointed out are too expensive for some people, and unlike a Forest + Forest combination you could get a LOT of results from a pure Mythic pool thanks to splitting colors.

I think we have enough reports to conclude that this is intended behavior (otherwise TL should say something about it after so many reports right?). And anyway, it's not like the behavior makes no sense. Pures resulting from a single color pool of their type is not at all a leap in logic. Now we just need to confirm whether it requires a gem dragon. I think it doesn't, and people just used gem dragons because they don't keep two of the same pure around with all these habitat space problems.

Do you think I should start putting the new stuff into the calculator already, or should we wait for some more Forest + Forest tests?